ACCA/CAT

RELEVANT TO ACCA QUALIFICATION PAPER F8 AND

FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTANCY PAPER FAU

Audit sampling

Paper F8, Audit and Assurance and Paper FAU, Foundations in Audit require

students to gain an understanding of audit sampling. While you won’t be

expected to pick a sample, you must have an understanding of how the various

sampling methods work. This article will consider the various sampling

methods in the context of Paper F8 and Paper FAU.

This subject is dealt with in ISA 530, Audit Sampling. The definition of audit

sampling is:

‘The application of audit procedures to less than 100% of items within a

population of audit relevance such that all sampling units have a chance of

selection in order to provide the auditor with a reasonable basis on which to

draw conclusions about the entire population.’1

In other words, the standard recognises that auditors will not ordinarily test all

the information available to them because this would be impractical as well as

uneconomical. Instead, the auditor will use sampling as an audit technique in

order to form their conclusions. It is important at the outset to understand that

some procedures that the auditor may adopt do not involve audit sampling,

100% testing of items within a population, for example. Auditors may deem

100% testing appropriate where there are a small number of high value items

that make up a population, or when there is a significant risk of material

misstatement and other audit procedures will not provide sufficient

appropriate audit evidence. However, candidates must appreciate that 100%

examination is highly unlikely in the case of tests of controls; such sampling is

more common for tests of detail (ie substantive testing).

The use of sampling is widely adopted in auditing because it offers the

opportunity for the auditor to obtain the minimum amount of audit evidence,

which is both sufficient and appropriate, in order to form valid conclusions on

the population. Audit sampling is also widely known to reduce the risk of

‘over-auditing’ in certain areas, and enables a much more efficient review of

the working papers at the review stage of the audit.

In devising their samples, auditors must ensure that the sample selected is

representative of the population. If the sample is not representative of the

population, the auditor will be unable to form a conclusion on the entire

population. For example, if the auditor tests only 20% of trade receivables for

existence at the reporting date by confirming after-date cash, this is hardly

representative of the population, whereas, say, 75% would be much more

representative.

2

AUDIT SAMPLING

AUGUST 2011

SAMPLING RISK

Sampling risk is the risk that the auditor’s conclusions based on a sample may

be different from the conclusion if the entire population were the subject of the

same audit procedure.

ISA 530 recognises that sampling risk can lead to two types of erroneous

conclusion:

1. The auditor concludes that controls are operating effectively, when in

fact they are not. Insofar as substantive testing is concerned (which is

primarily used to test for material misstatement), the auditor may

conclude that a material misstatement does not exist, when in fact it

does. These erroneous conclusions will more than likely lead to an

incorrect opinion being formed by the auditor.

2. The auditor concludes that controls are not operating effectively, when in

fact they are. In terms of substantive testing, the auditor may conclude

that a material misstatement exists when, in fact, it does not. In contrast

to leading to an incorrect opinion, these errors of conclusion will lead to

additional work, which would otherwise be unnecessary leading to audit

inefficiency.

Non-sampling risk is the risk that the auditor forms the wrong conclusion,

which is unrelated to sampling risk. An example of such a situation would be

where the auditor adopts inappropriate audit procedures, or does not

recognise a control deviation.

METHODS OF SAMPLING

ISA 530 recognises that there are many methods of selecting a sample, but it

considers five principal methods of audit sampling as follows:

? random selection

? systematic selection

? monetary unit sampling

? haphazard selection, and

? block selection.

Random selection

This method of sampling ensures that all items within a population stand an

equal chance of selection by the use of random number tables or random

number generators. The sampling units could be physical items, such as sales

invoices or monetary units.

Systematic selection

The method divides the number of sampling units within a population into the

sample size to generate a sampling interval. The starting point for the sample

can be generated randomly, but ISA 530 recognises that it is more likely to be

編輯推薦：

2015年ACCA考試《審計》輔導11

（責任編輯：）

共2頁,當前第1頁  第一頁  前一頁  下一頁